{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"KODAP Legal","provider_url":"https:\/\/kodaplegal.cz\/en","author_name":"sojkas","author_url":"https:\/\/kodaplegal.cz\/en\/author\/sojkas\/","title":"St\u0159\u00eddav\u00e1 p\u00e9\u010de a zam\u011bstn\u00e1n\u00ed rodi\u010d\u016f | KODAP Legal","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"RXt7hxiorF\"><a href=\"https:\/\/kodaplegal.cz\/en\/stridava-pece-a-zamestnani-rodicu\/\">St\u0159\u00eddav\u00e1 p\u00e9\u010de a zam\u011bstn\u00e1n\u00ed rodi\u010d\u016f<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/kodaplegal.cz\/en\/stridava-pece-a-zamestnani-rodicu\/embed\/#?secret=RXt7hxiorF\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"&#8220;St\u0159\u00eddav\u00e1 p\u00e9\u010de a zam\u011bstn\u00e1n\u00ed rodi\u010d\u016f&#8221; &#8212; KODAP Legal\" data-secret=\"RXt7hxiorF\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n\/\/# sourceURL=https:\/\/kodaplegal.cz\/wp-includes\/js\/wp-embed.min.js\n<\/script>","description":"\u00dastavn\u00ed soud v\u00a0ned\u00e1vn\u00e9 dob\u011b posuzoval vliv zam\u011bstn\u00e1n\u00ed rodi\u010de na rozhodov\u00e1n\u00ed o st\u0159\u00eddav\u00e9 p\u00e9\u010di o d\u00edt\u011b (I. \u00daS 847\/22). Jednalo se o p\u0159\u00edpad otce, kter\u00fd kv\u016fli stanoven\u00fdm pracovn\u00edm sm\u011bn\u00e1m p\u0159ich\u00e1zel o podstatnou \u010d\u00e1st soudem ur\u010den\u00e9ho styku se svoj\u00ed dcerou. V d\u016fsledku toho se st\u0159\u00eddav\u00e1 p\u00e9\u010de realizovala jenom v omezen\u00e9m rozsahu. Sv\u00fdm n\u00e1vrhem cht\u011bl otec doc\u00edlit toho, [&hellip;]"}